Causes:
Long-term
-
- Political conflict
- 1600-1868: New government called Bakufu
- Period is known as the Tokugawa Bakufu
- Shogun – general in charge, Daimyo – regional lords, Samurai – kept Daimyo in power
- All discouraged change
- Samurai culture did not want modern warfare
- Factionalism between lords
- Still had shinokosho caste system = four divisions of society = determined by birth (Samurai = shi, Farmers = no, Artisans = ko, Merchants = sho)
- No incentive for people to improve their lives
- 1600-1868: New government called Bakufu
- Economic
- Mainly agriculture, military weak, no technology
- No tax system – gov’t could not invest
- Samurais costed the government 50% of expenditure
- Social issues
- Lack of social mobility, more tensions, between samurai + merchants → Merchants had wealth but Samurais offered nothing to society
- Led to political fragmentation + failing hierarchy
- No public school system
- Women had no rights
- Lack of social mobility, more tensions, between samurai + merchants → Merchants had wealth but Samurais offered nothing to society
- Weakness of Japan
- 1842: Opium war worries japan (China was annihilated) – humiliated and defeated
- 1853: US Commodore Perry arrived = no tax system, no army, a lot of independance = Japan was forced to sign humiliating treaties
- Increase in tensions
- Samurai lost faith in the Shogun
- Called to return emperor
- Treaty of Kanghwa – embarrassing treaty, forces JP to open trade
- Political conflict
Short-term
- Choshu + Satsuma = were exposed to western ideas first (Dutch had modern)
- 1866 = Choshu and Satsuma clans = launched military campaign against Tokugawa ⇒ lost ⇒ showed inadequacy of government
- Collapse of Bakufu ⇒ Kyoto march in December 1867 = occupied the city = new emperor Meiji = abolish bakufu! (Jan 1868)
- Revere the emperor, expel the barbarians
- Iwakura Mission 1872, Hirobumi Mission 1882
Key events
Aims of the restoration
- Reverse humiliation
- Decisions made by genro (advisory group)
- From satsuma and choshu
Timeline
- 1868: Meiji Restoration starts = bakufu abolished
- Charter oath – new goals of society
- 1889: Meiji constitution
- 1894: Abolish unequal treaties
- 1894-5: Sino JP war, Japan gets TW and Korea
The Charter Oath
- The Charter Oath (April 1868)
- Increased public discussion
- No class system = all involved in affairs of state
- All allowed to have voice and your own job
- No evil customs
- More knowledge – study missions in Japan
Effects
- Government
- Centralised, bureaucratic gov’t that was accountable to the Emperor
- Structure
- 1868: new government and Council of State
- 1871: foreign office, diff gov’t departments, public works
- 1885: cabinet system – official roles for advisors (PM too)
- 1887: new civil service exams
- 1889: MEIJI constitution with parliament, elections
- Abolished the class system and traditional hierarchy
- Samurais = no more privileges – gave up power to work in government
- Daimyos (Lords) = abolished and now worked with the government
- Choshu and Satsuma = gave up their power and worked as the genro (advisors)
- Constitution with parliament
- Accountable to the emperor (cult)
- Economic development
- Highly developed transport + communications + railway + shipyard + consumer system
- Growing industrial sector
- Powerful army and navy (1871, army was created)
- Taxes were now collected to Tokyo, 270 domains → 70 PREFECTURES
- Meiji culture and society as a device to protect the interests of the small ruling group and in particular, the interests of industrial and financial capitalists, such as the huge zaibatsu conglomerates eg: Mitsubishi.
- 1880 had to sell them to private system
- Social development
- Education
- Mass schooling
- 1872: 4 years education is compulsory – 90% of people in school by 1880
- Educated population = no class restrictions
- Everyone would have their own voice (Charter Oath)
- Everyone could try for the cabinet (new system)
- Study missions to learn from the West (Iwakura mission)
- Diet = powerless, not all had power to vote (only 1%) = not real democracy
- 1880’s violent repression of political parties
- Government ministers were appointed in the name of the emperor by the ruling oligarchs NOT by the majority party in the Japanese parliament (the Diet).
- The 1898 Civil Laws placed the emperor at the head of the entire nation.
- Husbands and wives were not equal. Wives were treated as children, and were not allowed to take legal action.
- Women were banned from participating in political activities despite playing a key role in the developing industrial economy and textiles in particular.
- Education
- Strength of the emperor
- Abolition of Daimyo (regional lords)
- Gave land to the Emperor in 1870
- Daimyo were given handsome salaries and reappointed as governors = established = everything owed to emperor
- Choshu and Satsuma gave up power to Emperor
- Remaining ones were threatened with 1871 Imperial Japanese Army formed by Satsuma and Choshu
- 1871: all domains (regions) were demolished
- Emperors appointed the governors
- Abolition of Daimyo (regional lords)
- Military development
- Increased imperialist sentiment
- 1880 conscript army was established
- Samurai spirit – loyalties before to lords now transferred to emperor
- Conscription law in 1873 – military service was mandatory ⇒ Military would later reign in a power struggle.
- Samurai no longer had monopoly on military power
- Imperial rescript of 1882 – unquestioning loyalty to the emperor
- Success in sino-japanese war, russo-japanese war
The 1889 Constitution
Causes
Medium-term:
- Meiji Restoration
- Didn’t want full democracy, but also wanted a national assembly – disputes within the government
- Constitutional Study mission
- Led by Hirobumi → went abroad to look at different systems and implement in Japan
- Believed US = too democratic, UK = too much power to parliament
- Followed a Prussian system
- Wanted to balance Emperor power with the assembly’s power
Key features/effects
- Emperor
- Source of emperor’s legitimacy is in the Constitution
- Throne of lineal succession unbroken for eternity: Worship the emperor!
- Ancestors grant the Meiji emperor power
- Heart of the political system
- Sovereignty = Emperor
- Social
- Rights
- Not absolute
- Had law, freedom of speech, writing, public meeting, association, publication, freedom of religion “Within limit”
- 1925 granted freedom to vote but also Peace Preservation Law on the same day
- Political
- Bicameral parliament (the Diet)
- Elected lower house (could be dissolved by the emperor)
- Prime minister and cabinet = from emperor
- Military was controlled by Emperor
Does the Meiji Restoration constitute a ‘Revolution’?
- Aristocratic Revolution from the top – daimyo, right wing, Samurai revolution from above
- Definition
- Forcible overthrow of a government or social order
- Historian Binton: stages of revolution
- Starts because gov’t was inefficient, wealthy citizens feel restrained
- Rich angry, Radical phase, Counter-revolutionary phase
- Was it a revolution?
- Swapped one ruling class for another (Shogun and Bakufu) with Emperor + samurai elite (Choshu + Satsuma)
- Andrew Gordon: Yes, fundamental changes = revolution!
- Historian WG Beasley: Compared to French or Russian, not in the classical sense = nothing violent
Historiography
- Orthodox view: British hailed the revolution → Japan would be more civilised
- American press – imperial regime has come out of its chrysalis
- Japan – Takeaki (fought new regime) ⇒ only the views of a few
- Orthodox view also suggests that the cause of the restoration/revolution was the period of stagnation/weakness of Bakufu
- Did not consider the diet, constitution increased power of the emperor
- Andrew Gordon ⇒ HUGE CHANGE! Merit = revolution
- Revisionist: Meiji was despotic rule ⇒ autocratic
- E.g. Kaishu ⇒ critic of Restoration
- Nostalgic of the past, loss of life due to wars ⇒ sad
- Should be cooperation, not contest between Asia
- Autocratic – emperor increased in power, had the final mandate, could start war and suspend democracy
- Cullen’s revisionist perspective: Improved economy, military, faced West, NECESSARY repression
- Post-revisionist
- Meiji restoration was both
- Democratic – increased rights for people, freedoms, chances to voice themselves
- Created a great spirit that strengthened Japan, centralised power, and fought to the end
- Yet at the same time = neglected aspects such as cooperation, and restraint, and patience, rather, advocated for violence
- William Beasley: It was a restoration, not a revolution
- It was a nationalist movement ⇒ emotional, populist campaign